Skip to content

Sovol 3D Printer Tools Kit 36PCS: problems, parts and running costs

Checked: 2026-10-25

Summary

The recurring complaints are about quality and completeness rather than breakage: the digital caliper feels flimsy, the art knives and small pliers are functional rather than premium, and storage is a drawstring pouch. The 36-piece count includes 15 spare blades, and at least one reviewer states the kit ships no nozzle cleaning needles and no flush cutter. There is no recurring cost beyond optional blade replacements, and no annual running-cost figure can be given. It is a good portable starter set at $25 or less, fair at $26-35, and poor value above $35.

Common problems and fixes

Parts and consumables

Yearly running cost

Not enough data. There is no proprietary lock-in and no required recurring cost: the 10 deburring and 5 knife blades are included, and the caliper runs on an LR44 battery. Optional spend is blade replacements and, if needed, a separate flush cutter or nozzle-needle set; no prices for those were found, so no annual figure can be given.

When it is a good buy

Prices as of 2026-10-25: Sovol sells the 13-piece variant at $19.99 in the US and €19.99 in the EU, and a third-party affiliate listing showed $35.99 for the 78-piece variant. A retailer mirror lists the 36-piece kit at $24.99 on sale against $29.99 regular, and editorial comparisons cite $25-35. At $25 or less it is good value as a portable starter set, since it includes the deburring tool, six needle files, spatulas, caliper and finger protector while skipping hex keys that ship with printers. $26-35 is fair: the caliper and files justify the price, but the missing nozzle needles and flush cutter mean additional spend. Above $35 the value drops, since a 45-piece set with a caliper and tube cutter, or a 68-piece set with five nozzle needle sizes and a fabric case, offers more capability for similar money. If you already own flush cutters and a caliper, a $10-15 deburring and file set is the better buy and this kit is redundant. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Sources