Skip to content

Makita 9557PBX1 4-1/2 in. Paddle Switch Cut-Off/Angle Grinder: problems, parts and running costs

Checked: 2026-10-18

Summary

The recurring weak point is the switch: on older small Makitas the switch or the plastic bar that activates it is what fails, usually well past the 1-year warranty. Running costs are consumable grinding wheels and cut-off blades plus an occasional carbon-brush set, and no yearly total is published. The kit is fair money up to about $130 and poor value above $160, where 11-13 A competitors with variable speed become reachable.

Common problems and fixes

Parts and consumables

Yearly running cost

No yearly total is published. Consumables dominate: grinding wheels and cut-off blades for the standard 5/8-11 spindle, plus an occasional carbon-brush set. There are no proprietary cartridges, subscriptions or other consumables, and electricity is a 7.5 A household-cord draw that stays small next to the wheels.

When it is a good buy

Retailer snapshots read 2026-10: the kit was $124.00 at Pacific Power Tools and Acme Tools, $124.99 at City Mill, $144.99 at Northern Tool and $149.95 at Global Industrial (Power Pack); the bare 9557PB was $69.95 at Delta Diamond and the slide-switch 9557NB $99.00 at MaxTool. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The kit’s premium over the bare tool runs about $25-55, roughly the value of the included wheels, diamond blade and case. Up to about $130 the kit is fair to good money if the accessories would be bought anyway; from $131-160 it turns weak to fair because 11-13 A competitors and variable-speed models become reachable; above $160 it is poor value for a 7.5 A tool with a 1-year warranty. [2][5] Alternatives: the bare 9557PB is the better choice when the case and wheels are not needed; the Makita GA5052 (11 A, listed at $129 in one comparison) is the better pick when more power matters; the DeWalt DWE402 is the heavy-duty pick in the same class; and Pro Tool Reviews names Metabo and Metabo HPT for corded 4-1/2 in work, where the 3-year warranty is the better choice when coverage length matters. [5][23][24][7]

Sources