BLACK+DECKER CM1160B 12-Cup Programmable Coffeemaker: problems, parts and running costs

Checked: 2026-10-05

Summary

The CM1160B is a budget 12-cup drip coffeemaker (about 5 oz per cup, 975 W, 120 V) with 24-hour auto brew, a Sneak-A-Cup pause and a 2 Year Limited Warranty, and the complaints that repeat for this exact model are physical rather than electronic: hot-plate corrosion, condensation around the lid and display, and loud running noise. Keeping it going costs coffee, basket-style paper filters if you use them, and vinegar for the monthly descaling the manual documents — no pods, no subscription, no consumable lock-in. At the manufacturer’s own store price of $40.99 in October 2026 it is a fair buy for a large pot on a timer, but no one has published brew-temperature data for this model, so it is not a machine to buy for temperature consistency.

Common problems and fixes

Parts and consumables

Yearly running cost

Electricity is the only running cost with a published figure behind it: 975 W [1]. Everything else is what you put into the machine, and coffee is effectively the whole bill. Add basket-style paper filters if you use them, and one bottle of white vinegar or descaler every few months for the manual’s monthly clean [3]. The research contains no filter-pack price, no descaler price, no electricity rate and no count of how many brews a typical owner runs per week, so a yearly total cannot be computed from these sources. There is no consumable lock-in and no subscription; nothing ties the machine to a specific brand of anything beyond the part numbers above. [3]

When it is a good buy

BLACK+DECKER’s own store listed CM1160B-1-VN at $40.99 in October 2026, Sold Out for black with the white CM1160W-1 in stock at the same $40.99, and the rest of its 12-cup line runs from $29.99 to $89.99 [2][7]. At or below about $41 the machine does what a budget programmable drip brewer should and carries a 2 Year Limited Warranty [1][2][7]. In the low-to-mid $40s the case rests on price and on your return window, not on measured performance, because no instrumented test of this exact model was found [8][9].

Named alternatives from the research, with what each is better for:

Sources